About

Webb and Bordson, APC is a civil law firm with offices in both Fresno and San Diego, California with a heightened focus on dedicated, honest client service. Unlike other law firms, our attorneys provide honest, straightforward advice in order for our clients to clearly understand the options and solutions available to them and we never make promises we can’t keep.

Our core philosophy has always been to place client service above all else, and by doing so, we are rewarded by developing strong, lasting relationships with our clients. At Webb and Bordson, APC, we believe that the primary duty of a San Diego business attorney is to be a creative problem solver - an advocate with specialized knowledge who can use his or her skills to restore justice when a person or company has been wronged. Visit http://wblawgroup.com/ for more details.

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Letting the Court Evict A Tenant

A lease agreement is a document between a landlord and the tenant renting his property.  This document is honored by the state as a legally binding contract.  Both parties must honor all terms of this contract, and if they don't they may be sued for breach of contract.  

http://wblawgroup.com/WebbBordson/blog/for-breach-of-lease-contract-you-can-let-the-court-evict-the-tenant/

Ciara Sued for Breach of Contract

Read this article we found about singer Ciara:

Pulling out of a gay pride event has resulted in a lawsuit for Ciara. A Hollywood nightspot is suing the "Body Party" singer, alleging she signed a $10,000 appearance fee contract only to walk away from the deal. 

The Factory claims CiCi first signed on to sing at the L.A. Gay Pride weekend celebration tonight (Jun. 7), but had to scale down to merely making an appearance due to restrictions in her contract for tomorrow's show that she is headlining. Venue reps claim they were under the impression that Ciara would still be stopping by, and is suing to recoup money lost from her cancellation just earlier this week (Jun. 3), saying that they were left to scramble for an adequate replacement and lost money in marketing and promotion. 

A rep for Ciara countered, telling TMZ that she nixed the gig long before the final negotiation stage, and that her slot on the Pride Festival's main stage took precedence. "Ciara's commitment to perform at L.A. Gay Pride on Saturday (June 8) night prevented her from making such a Friday night appearance. Despite being notified early last week that Ciara could not appear, the Factory continued to market and promote Ciara's appearance."

"The reason for the continued marketing/promotion is unclear, as it is not known why the Factory would intend to continue to mislead the public, to cause damage to the L.A. Gay Pride festival and to attempt to portray Ciara in a negative light.”

Ciara's team followed with a tweet clearing up any more confusion. "The ONLY place Ciara will be performing at this weekend is headlining the Gay Pride Festival. Other advertisements are false!!"

http://www.bet.com/news/music/2013/06/07/ciara-sued-for-breach-of-contract.html

Thursday, August 15, 2013

Three Elements For Breach of Contract

Here at WB Law Group we know suing or getting sued for breach of contract requires three elements.  These elements can be compared to a camera's tripod.  Just like a camera's tripod if one leg is missing it can not stand. 

http://wblawgroup.com/WebbBordson/blog/contract-law-attorney-cites-3-elements-for-a-breach-of-contract-case-to-stand/

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

California Statute of Limitations for Civil and Personal Injury Actions - An Overview

Read this article we found on the statute of limitations in California:

What Is A "Statute of Limitations"

A statute of limitations is a law which places a time limit on pursuing a legal remedy in relation to wrongful conduct. After the expiration of the statutory period, unless a legal exception applies, the injured person loses the right to file a lawsuit seeking money damages or other relief.

Proliferation of Statutes

Although people often speak of "the statute of limitations", in fact there are many statutes which apply limitations periods to civil actions. Sometimes it can be difficult to keep track of the various statutes and their exceptions. Thus it is a very good idea for somebody who is concerned about losing their right to sue as a result of the expiration of the statutory limitations period to consult with a qualified lawyer, who can help determine which statute applies, and help preserve the right to recover damages.

Specific Civil Actions

The following periods represent a small sample of the statutory limitations periods in California. Please note that it may be possible to bring multiple causes of action from a single incident of wrongful conduct, and thus even if it appears that the relevant statute of limitations has run it may remain possible to bring a different claim. Also, there may be an exception to the standard limitations period that applies to any given situation. The following list is provided by way of example. If you wish to know how the statute of limitations applies to a specific situation, you should verify the statutory time period and its relevance to your situation with a qualified California lawyer.
Professional Malpractice: Legal malpractice, 1 year from date of discovery, to a maximum of four years from the date of the wrongful act. Medical malpractice, 3 years from the date of the injury, or one year from the date the plaintiff discovers or reasonably should have discovered the injury, whichever occurs first. If the medical malpractice action is based upon the presence of a foreign object found inside the plaintiff's body, the statute of limitations does not start to run until the plaintiff discovers, or should have discovered, the object. The periods of limitation for medical malpractice apply to minors six years of age and older.
Personal Injury: 2 years.
Fraud: 3 years.
Libel / Slander / Defamation: 1 year.
Injury to Personal Property: 3 years.
Product Liability: 2 years.
Contracts: Written, 4 years; Oral, 2 years.

Statute of Limitations or Statute of Repose

A statute of repose is different from a statute of limitations, in that after the statutory period has expired it is not possible to file a lawsuit even if an injury occurs after that time. For example, if there is a twenty year statute of repose on the manufacture of aircraft, a claim cannot be filed against the manufacturer more than twenty years after the date of manufacture, even if a design or manufacturing defect is responsible for a later accident.

Accrual of Claims

A statute of limitations is said to start running at the time a claim accrues. Ordinarily, that is the time at which an injury is suffered.

The Discovery Rule

Sometimes it is not reasonably possible for a person to discover the cause of an injury, or even to know that an injury has occurred, until considerably after the act which causes the injury. For example, an error in the drafting of a will might not be noticed until the will is being executed, decades after it was drafted, or a financial planner's embezzlement might not be noticed for years due to the issuance of false statements of account.
When it applies, the "discovery rule" permits a suit to be filed within a certain period of time after the injury is discovered, or reasonably should have been discovered. The discovery rule does not apply to all civil injuries, and sometimes the period of time for bringing a claim post-discovery can be short, so it is important to seek legal assistance quickly in the event of the late discovery of an injury.

Tolling of the Statute of Limitations

In addition to late discovery, it may be possible to avoid the harsh result of a statute of limitation by arguing that the statute has been "tolled". When it is said that a statute is "tolled", it means that something has stopped the statute from running for a period of time. Typical reasons for tolling a statute of limitations include minority (the victim of the injury was a minor at the time the injury occurred), mental incompetence (the victim of the injury was not mentally competent at the time the injury occurred), and the defendant's bankruptcy (the "automatic stay" in bankruptcy ordinarily tolls the statute of limitations until such time as the bankruptcy is resolved or the stay is lifted).
Under California law, except in cases of medical malpractice, a minor has two years from the date of his or her 18th birthday to file a tort claim. For medical malpractice actions involving minors below the age of six, the action must be filed within three years of the date of the injury or before the minor's eighth birthday, whichever period is greater.

Contractual Limitations

It is often possible to shorten a statutory limitations period by contract. For example, an employment contract might require that any claim relating to the employment relationship, including wrongful termination, be filed within one year of the claimed wrongful conduct. Courts often uphold these clauses, particularly in the context of business transactions, even though they provide for a shorter limitations period than the statute of limitations would otherwise apply.

http://www.expertlaw.com/library/limitations_by_state/California.html

Statute of Limitations for Breach of Contract

Lets look at the example of a restaurant owner.  The restaurants enters into a written contract with a seafood supplier.  Everything was going smoothly until the supplier missed his quota of seafood.  This results in your customers being disappointed that their favorite dish is not available.  This restaurant owner might then consider legal action agains the supplier for breach of contract. 

http://wblawgroup.com/WebbBordson/blog/what-is-the-statute-of-limitations-for-breach-of-contract/

Friday, August 9, 2013

Discrimination Comes in Different Shades

California is known for having a mix of different races, ethnic origins, and nationalities.  That is how California got the nickname, "The Melting Pot."  California's population over the last half-century has increased greatly.  This is due to the amount of immigrants from across the Pacific Ocean and jus south of the border. 


http://wblawgroup.com/WebbBordson/blog/racial-discrimination-101-san-diego-employment-attorney-notes-that-discrimination-comes-in-different-shades/

Wednesday, August 7, 2013

Reasons for Having a Real Estate Attorney Present at Closing

Check out this article on real estate attorneys:

So far everything has gone well: You've found the perfect house, and you've obtained a mortgage with a low interest rate. You've agreed to the closing date, and now you're thinking of some new furniture or some additional landscaping for your new home. So why not save a little money for those items by skipping a lawyer and handling the closing yourself?

Legal Language

Buyers and sellers alike can often find the closing process confusing. According to the Diamond Law Group, there are numerous documents to prepare and sign as well as documents to record, taxes to pay and transfer and insurance provisions to make. However, most of this is couched in legal terms unfamiliar to the average buyer and seller. Not only will an attorney make sure that all documents are handled according to the law, he will also be able to explain the meaning of the formal language and terms.

State Laws

While many laws governing real estate transactions are the same everywhere in the country, some are specific to individual states. For example, in California sellers must disclose certain information such as known defects, the existence of any environmental dangers, items to remain on the property, and whether a death has occurred on the property within the prior three years along with the circumstances surrounding it. If the buyer opts for a home inspection, California law prescribes what the inspector can and should look for during the inspection. Those same real estate laws enumerate the closing costs that a buyer should expect to pay.

Dispute Settlement

While it may seem that the purchase agreement is straightforward, disputes can arise at the closing over the cost of the property, time of possession, personal property remaining or being removed, and even zoning or restrictions concerning use. A real estate lawyer has the expertise to help settle any such disputes before the closing is finalized.

Real Estate Agent or Lawyer?

Many buyers and sellers believe that the real estate agent can handle any procedures that are part of the closing. However, the real estate agent's duty is to act as an agent for the buyer or seller only; he usually does not have the legal expertise to settle any disputes or difficult situations that may arise. Most participants in a closing will find that the additional cost of a lawyer is money well spent.

http://homeguides.sfgate.com/reasons-having-real-estate-attorney-present-closing-1547.html

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Wordpress Tumblr Favorites More